Tuesday, February 28, 2017

How do IT and Co-creation complement each other?

How do IT and Co-creation complement each other?



It is anything but simple to explain the relationship between IT (information technology), small businesses and the Co Creation Phenomena. But there is no doubt that they have been really helpful for the growth of small businesses over the years. Crowdholding combines all three connecting the crowd and entrepreneurs to co-create, allowing them to give feedback and ideas for future revenue. In this article we will try to explain this topic the best we can, by doing some references to many articles related to this matter.

During the 1990s, notions of the extended enterprise and the boundaryless organization encouraged managers to broaden their search for efficiencies and discover ways of creating value from their supplier network and beyond. Starting in 1995, the Internet further invigorated the corporate pursuit of efficiency, this time expanding it to include all the activities directly involving or affecting the company–customer relationship. Still, throughout this evolution, the assumption that internal cost efficiency is the source of value creation has remained unchallenged.

CO CREATION PHENOMENA

How do companies co-create valuable experiences with consumers?

The traditional company-centric view says: (1) the consumer is outside the domain of the value chain; (2) the enterprise controls where, when, and how value is added in the value chain; (3) value is created in a series of activities controlled by the enterprise before the point of purchase; (4) there is a single point of exchange where value is extracted from the customer for the enterprise.

The consumer-centric view says: (1) the consumer is an integral part of the system for value creation; (2) the consumer can influence where, when, and how value is generated; (3) the consumer need not respect industry boundaries in the search for value; (4) the consumer can compete with companies and small business for value extraction; (5) there are multiple points of exchange where the consumer and the company can co-create value.

In the customer-centric mass production and marketing of automobiles, for example, suppliers provide raw materials, components, subcomponents, and systems to manufacturers, who create value by assembling these inputs into vehicles. Consumers actively decide what vehicle to buy, but companies decide what their choices will be. Cars are sold by dealers acting as intermediaries for the automakers. For companies reliant on this scenario, value creation is defined solely by extracting profit from end consumers.

Consumers appreciate and expect efficiency when it improves their experience with a product or service. But most of the time, managers are so preoccupied with operating efficiently that they don’t even think about value in terms of the consumer’s experience. (See Exhibit 1.) Ask yourself: Do you as a consumer of a digital camera think about the complex sourcing patterns and logistics that the manufacturer has to deal with, or are you thinking about the fun you will have when you bring the camera to the beach to record your children’s first ocean swim?

Because companies have historically controlled all business activities involved in the co creation of the things they sell, it is their view of value that is dominant. Indeed, the consumer typically has little or no influence on value created until the point of exchange when ownership of the product is typically transferred to the consumer from the firm. This is true whether the consumer is a company or an individual.

Now consumers are challenging this corporate logic of value creation. Spurred by the consumer-centric culture of Crowdholding — with its emphasis on interactivity, speed, individuality, and openness — the consumer’s influence on value creation has never been greater, and it is spreading to all points in the value chain. (See “The Five Powers of the Connected Consumer”)


The 3 Powers of the Connected Consumer and information technology

Before the Internet liberated information technology, companies could do everything — choose materials used in products, design production processes, craft marketing messages, control sales channels — with no interference. Now, consumers exercise their influence in every part of the business system. Nevertheless, companies should welcome, not resist, the consumer powers detailed below.

1. Information Access.
With access to unprecedented amounts of information, consumers have the knowledge to make much more informed decisions. This is causing companies across industries to cede control over value creation and develop new ways of doing business. Consider health care. More than 70 million Americans have reportedly used the Internet to learn about diseases and treatment options and investigate how to get involved in clinical drug trials. Consumers now question their physicians more aggressively and participate more fully in choosing treatments. This is dramatically altering traditional pharmaceutical sales practices. In the U.S., it is driving consumer-centric “defined-contribution” health-care reform wherein companies give employees information and ask them to assume more responsibility for selecting and managing their own health-care benefits.

2. Global View.
The Internet is the first single source of information that gives consumers the ability, 24 hours a day, to see what is happening around the world. That is changing the rules for how companies compete. For example, multinationals are more exposed to consumer scrutiny of product price and performance across geographies, which means those businesses have less latitude to vary the price or quality of products sold in multiple regions. But it also means companies have more information to sharpen global strategies. New competitors and potential partners for large companies are also emerging in the global marketplace. Even poor artisans in Rajasthan, India, can sell high-quality table linen on the Web for $10 and deliver it to buyers in the U.S. in about a week, and for one-tenth the cost of comparable linen in the United States.

3. Networking.
Consumers naturally coalesce around common skills, interests, and experiences. The Internet amplifies this by encouraging an unparalleled ease and openness of communication among perfect strangers. Indeed, “communities of interest,” where individuals confabulate and commiserate without geographic constraints and with few social barriers, exist all over the Web. People participating in a chat area may know nothing more about those they’re chatting with than the interest they share. The power of consumer networks is that they’re independent and based on real consumer experiences, not what the company tells them they will experience.

Have you got something to add to our story? We, at Crowdholding are happy to hear your feedback. Learn about Crowdholding in 1 minute by watching our Youtube video.

Monday, February 27, 2017

Corruption on Wall Street: The Stolen American Dream

Corruption on Wall Street: The Stolen American Dream



It is a commonly perceived notion that corruption exists because of a prevalence of corruption amongst politicians, however, corrupt governments only breath because they are receiving a constant supply of oxygen through corrupt institutions. Be an engaged citizen and help Crowdholding to raise awareness and make a stand against Wall street. Watch a 1-minute video to understand how.


Most of the US citizens do believe that there is existing corruption in the financial system, but they do not have the accurate approximation of corruption due to the lack of an idea about the corrupt institutions propagating corrupt financial structures. One of the key player in stealing the American Dream is Wall Street and its prevailing corruption, and if you want to know how wall street is corrupt read below for 5 reasons why Wall Street investment practices are becoming fraudulent:
Price Manipulation:
Price manipulation is a known corrupt investment practice and several whistle blowers came forward with evidence suggesting that investment institutions in wall street have openly been manipulating gold and silver prices and regulators are not doing anything about the corruption.
Lack of Accountability
The accountability and transparency regulations to hold corrupt officials of wall street accountable are becoming increasingly weaker. For example, Joe Cassano who was responsible for bringing down AIG was never prosecuted for his corrupt practices.
Back Door Deals
Companies with ties to the US government have openly been making back door deals that are against their clients’ interests, however, those companies are functioning freely without any consequences and one such example is the corrupt practices of Goldman Sachs.
Accounting Tactics
It is believed that major banks of wall street are employing accounting tactics to hide the size of their balance sheets at the end of reporting periods, to avoid tax and legal implications. But is the government doing anything about it? Well, not that we have heard of.
Invasion of Privacy
Credit card companies are believed to be employing invasive data mining techniques to predict their clients’ behavior. Invasion of privacy of clients is unlawful, especially if they don’t know about it. However, it seems like we don’t much about our privacy invasion but the regulatory institutes sure do, but the biased favor given to wall street bankers by the corrupt government practices is giving the freedom of corruption to wall street institutions and there is a need for effective regulation.
Wall Street bankers have been able to earn huge sums of money through corruption and fraud due to the lack of accountability and transparency in the system. The corrupt values and tainted practices of wall street and corrupt government need to be regulated, and one of the ways to do that is to inform the general public on how their American Dream is being stolen without them even being aware of it.
Be an engaged citizen and help Crowdholding to raise awareness and make a stand against Wall street. Watch a 1-minute video to understand how.

Sunday, February 26, 2017

Year 2020 in Crowdsourcing



Over the past few years, crowdsourcing has become very popular especially for small businesses. It is basically a new type of a work process. You gather people in the form of a crowd to help you with a task which otherwise would have been performed by a single employee. Crowdholding connects the crowd and small businesses to co-create and share revenue.
It is a very goоd means of marketing today. For instance to make a company logo small business do not require to hire an agency, a freelancer or an in-house fashion designer. Instead, by using crowdsourcing they can post according to their needs and then many designers will compete to create a custom logo for your company. Crowdsourcing today is not only used for the purpose of simple graphic designing. It now has four different categories such as Microtasks, Crowdfunding, Macrotasks and Crowd Contests. The Internet and public websites are a great help in ensuring effective crowdsourcing technique. These include Wikipedia and IMDB on the top list.
Following are some of the top future trends in the crowdsourcing(Crowd Economy) to look upon as Crowdsourcing continues to gain momentum.
Firstly, curated crowds may not always mean that they will give your better output with crowdsourcing. In the earlier stage of crowdsourcing design websites, it was evident that crowdsourcing groups with large crowds delivered average outputs. The greater there is the variety of different designs available, the more difficult it would be for you to sift out the bad designs. Crowdholding deals with this by allowing the crowd to vote on the best ideas.
Moreover, as crowdsourcing is being greatly used for Microtasks various quality control mechanisms are added on the top of basic input and output level to ensure success. This will also lead to high levels of accuracy.
Crowdsourcing has not yet become an industry; rather it is one form of an undefined space. Work is being now done to standardize it and define its space bounds. Popular groups such as the Crowdsortium are the real players discussing the changes required in crowdsourcing now. Suggestions are coming in the trade association and the leaders working to define the official taxonomy of crowdsourcing. All these efforts will ensure a healthy future of crowdsourcing.
Corporate owners who have just entered the entrepreneur world are also adopting crowdsourcing. So, crowdsourcing is not at all bad for early adopters. Large corporations which use Crowdsourcing include General Electric, PepsiCo, Procter and Gamble, and Amazon. Other companies will thus be able to adopt crowdsourcing. Eventually, Crowdholding makes sure that small businesses will find it easy to adopt it as well.
Though with every passing year crowdsourcing use is increasing but still it's in an early adoption phase. Very few people across the globe know the real potential of crowdsourcing.
The top three trends in the crowdsourcing are stress crowd-currencies, customer co-creation, sharing economy. With the growing popularity of crowdsourcing crowd, currencies are also greatly used now. It also leads to customer co-creation which is beneficial for business in many ways. Crowdsourcing is playing a great role in leading to a sharing economy. Similar to as what You Tube did to TV and blogs did to traditional media peer to peer sharing trend is becoming very popular and a major disruptive force. In a few year, it will create many winners and losers. Therefore, in all ways, Crowdsourcing is a great networking marketing tool with growing potential.

Learn more about Crowdholding in 1 minute. Watch this Youtube video.

Saturday, February 25, 2017

Fashion startups and crowdsourcing


Crowdsourcing is fostering a new age in creative, ethical, and environmentally sound designs from largely unknown talent looking to make their name. New small private brands and designers can collaborate with the crowd on Crowdholding to effectively create a community around their brands.
It’s not just new brands and designers that can use crowdsourcing; it’s a tool employed by even the most established designers in the fashion industry.It also allows customers to shop for quality practical designs with a clear conscience and even invest in new lines and enterprises.
For the designers at large retailers, handing over creative control to the consumer is unrealistic, but that doesn’t mean there aren’t uses for crowdsourcing in this segment too.  A winning combination of crowdsourced opinion (which will guarantee garments stocked will be popular!) and gamification, without having to alter the design process. Crowdholding takes this process one step further, by also reimbursing the crowd for their ideas with future revenue from the fashion garments they helped co-create.
In the competitive world of fashion, more aspiring designers hoping to be the next Alexander McQueen or Vivien Westwood are finding a financial support and voice for their projects through crowdfunding. Indeed, crowdfunding is steadily changing the world of fashion, but not just by enabling more designers to have their work noticed and financed. It is attracting new and creative designs, and is even generating a focus on ethically produced and eco-friendly pieces that are not always found in the high-end fashion industry.
“A fashion designer’s mission is to create something the public needs or wants before they even know it. If suggestions are part of the mix, they are coming from a Creative Director, a Buyer for a store or a trusted colleague. Information from a stranger, though kind enough to pay in advance for merchandise down the road, is not necessarily the voice a designer is likely to take as gospel.”
Cameesa, bought by Zazzle, offers freelance designers the opportunity to gain recognition for their work whilst securing funding for their line. Designs are submitted and then selected by a panel who then put them forward for funding. Interested investors can purchase a t-shirt which they will receive if the design reaches its funding target, not only entitling them to their own t-shirt but also a small percentage of future sales.
Any business that attempts to break up the cliquey nature of the fashion industry should be applauded. In the age of the so-called Web 2.0, the Harvard Business School pair of Gulati and Weng have recognized the importance of social media, and, more importantly, the growing need to develop tighter relations and dialogues with the consumer.
With the removal of the middleman, the designer gets a greater share of their profit, and the consumer has greater access and influence over the preceding season’s designs. As with all startups, there are ifs, buts and maybes that will need to be addressed before one can say whether Fashion Stake is the revolutionary business that will really take off in a big way.
Nevertheless, if the legalities can be ironed out, the company’s principles are intriguing and their ambition to try and shake up the fashion industry is truly admirable.
Example
Pose: Denoted as fashion hauls meets crowdsourcing, Pose.com (and its accompanying free app) is an online community that allows their clients to follow what their favorite influencers and friends are wearing in real-time. With opportunities for users to showcase their style finds via photo uploading, geo-tagging, Twitter and Facebook, the platform allows users to get immediate feedback on what they are trying on from a community of “fashion experts”. Influencers (or posers) on the Pose platform include Coco Rocha, Rachel Zoe, the Man Repeller, Catt Sadler, Atlantic Pacific and more.
Crowdholding connects the crowd with fashion entrepreneurs to co-create, allowing them to give ideas and feedback for future revenue. Learn about Crowdholding in 1 minute by watching our Youtube video.

Friday, February 24, 2017

Blockchain in the Entertainment industry

Blockchain in the Entertainment industry



The digital revolution has changed the media and music industry in the past 10 years. You probably heard of these effects during the early 2010's and late 00's with the death of the newspaper and the death of music labels. These extreme changes not only affected the artists and music publications, but it also affected the people that receive the information: like fake news and artists raising the price for their music. Unlike 20-30 years ago when controlling the distribution of something like music and news was easy, the media has to discover new ways to confirm their publications to avoid forgery.


  Even though the music and news media hasn't fully adapted to these changes with artists still losing millions and fake news being bigger than ever, we are entering another revolution. This revolution includes the use of cryptocurrency and blockchain technology. You might rarely hear about this now, but I guarantee by this time next year Blockchain technology will be the hot word and both the news and music industry can both profit.




Why Blockchain technology changing the music industry can be good?


   Blockchain technology is produced by cryptographic hashes making it completely irreversible and forge-proof. These applications don't have any forum of a 'middleman' and can be completely created by the artist. Each music piece can be bought in a completely unique identification number giving you total ownership of that number. This means that you can't share this with friends since it can be lost and not taken back. This might lead to some resells in the virtual space, but the original artist can still profit from it. This what makes blockchain so exciting it's like a virtual piece of property that you own online through your computer. It's also the reason why so many artists in the music industry are beginning to implement blockchain technology to their selling platform. Blockchain technology is an illegal downloader worst nightmare and it's coming fast.


How can Blockchain technology change the media industry?


      Blockchain technology can disrupt any current established technology and forms of entertainment, but one industry you wouldn't expect it to change is the media industry. The media industry felt the digital revolution the hardest. Thousands of media companies (mainly local) shut down all opertations because they couldn't keep up with the massive digital changes, and much more are still trying their best to trash outdated ways of publishing. And if you remember in the late 00's and early 2010s you would hear about a media company shutting down operations due to people not reading the news. With this being said you would think that a new revolution could hurt the media industry instead of help. Luckily, the implication of blockchain technology could actually help media publishers.  Blockchain technology can be shared within a community of other people that uses the same blockchain application. This can prevent copyright and forgery for subscription based entertainment. It could also stop fake news from spreading; confirmed subscribers in the blockchain community can state if the publisher actually published an article on a specific subject.


How can Blockchain change these two industries?


     Blockchain technology is unavoidable and will be the biggest forum of technology ever! It's the next gold rush in digital media and will alter the landscape. We don't have any idea by how much of a change it can create but it will be huge; there is no doubt about it. It might be a little bumpy at first ,like with all changes, but it will get better once these two industries adapt.

Peer to peer revolutionizing the marketplace

Peer to peer revolutionizing the marketplace

Peer to peer networks have been revolutionizing every industry and it is impacting every field of life. The marketplace revolution has also been brought-up by the peer to peer services. Sharing economies have been playing an important role and in this article, we would let you know that how collaborative learning is being done. There are many companies which are promoting peer to peer networks. We would like to share the examples of Uber, AirBnB and Crowdholding to let you understand that how these companies have completely changed the dynamics of their own fields.
Take Crowdholding as an example. Widely used by Millennials working or studying abroad and businesses dealing across borders, Crowdholding’s consumer-to-business platform connects the public with entrepreneurs to co-create, allowing them to share ideas and feedback for future revenue. The crowd and businesses are brought together to collaborate, innovate and share a % of future sales.
Uber is a car sharing service; one can easily request a car ride from the nearby Uber driver and he will be ready to serve you. The car service is available in just one click through a mobile application. Prior to the current circumstances, the transportation of travelers stayed to be a restraining infrastructure held by taxi organizations. In the interim, there were a large number of general drivers with their own autos going the same bearing you do and willing to give you a ride for an installment you can manage.
It was Uber that disclosed individuals how to render their vehicles into instruments, procuring to self-keep up. The service is a transportation help, installment goes straightforwardly to drivers who had enlisted with the Uber application. Not long after the application was presented, a hefty portion of cab drivers left authority employments and began to work freely.
Another huge shared service is Airbnb, it works in some comparable way. Why do one has to buy a place in a pleasant place every-time he or she visits that place for any professional or for the personal holiday trip. You can now find a great place everywhere through this application anywhere in the world. A host and a visitor contact specifically on the Airbnb's site and concur on the rent cost and different terms of living.
It is evident Airbnb and Uber gave a kick–start to the sharing economy improvement. Be that as it may, we recollect that customary economy was an encouraging ground for the publicizing and advertising.
In this way, the companies are now encouraging peer to peer services and networks. The customers have also taken great advantage of these services and this is the reason they prefer to use these applications rather than choosing the old and typical style. The sharing economy is changing the customer’s way of interaction with the brands.
These companies have introduced the culture of sharing economy in the marketplace and now customers are well aware of its benefits. They always look forward to their own easy rather than giving the huge amount of costs to other companies for the same level of service.

Possession of things are now considered as an out of fashion thing; customers prefer to rent out the things from people rather than buying it which can cost them much more than renting cost. From kitchen accessories to clothing, everything is now available for rent. New peer-to-peer marketplaces help people save money. Join the sharing economy on Crowdholding. Also enjoy this nice video example of Family home holiday accommodation marketplace.

Clothing stratups and peer-to-peer fashion

Clothing stratups and peer-to-peer fashion
Throughout the years, peer to peer service has risen practically in every field that one can imagine. The fast growth of peer to peer services is due to the benefits people have with the help of this service. We can also observe the peer to peer service in the fashion industry; Clothing startups continue the trend by co-creating directly with the crowd on Crowdholding. In this article, we are going to tell you that how it is done and how it has impacted the clothing business.
Peer to peer in the fashion industry or in the clothing business works in a way that you do not buy the dress for any occasion rather you can wear it by getting it on rent. Today, we can see that the dresses are very expensive and many dresses are just bought to wear for any single special occasion. In such circumstances, everyone does not wish to pay so much money to buy such an expensive dress. Now with peer to peer service in this industry, people can easily have their favorite dress on rent and after wearing it for any special occasion like wedding, party, Christmas, or any other.
Building peer to peer network in this industry really helps the people to have a diverse range of clothing that they can wear for any event. On the other hand, money is the biggest factor and renting the dress, fashion accessories, jewelry, or any item enables them to save a large amount of money.
We would also like to share the example with you so that you can also get to know which companies are offering peer to peer services and this will make your understanding about this service in a better way. French business visionary Fiona Disegni has started a new company Rentez-Vous that permits individuals to rent their garments, and make them shifted to other’s wardrobe, and meet similarly invested people. It is just like the Airbnb for the fashion industry.
Design absolutely has the foundation for it. Her paper at the Institut d'études politiques in Rennes was in communitarian utilization. Form and advertising temporary jobs then took after at Burberry, JWT, and Asos, before she devoted herself to Rentez-Vous full-time a year ago.
"I began with a little occasion in a level in Paris with companions," she clarifies. "We'd have occasions each month, then I moved to London and began occasions here consistently.
So far the idea has been occasions based – 40 to 50 people join, pay an entry fee and bring their garments to rent or have the simple purpose to meet and browse. The rental cost is set at 15% of the original retail cost for one week's contract, which midpoints at £20. Rentez-Vous takes a 20% charge from each contract. In any case, the genuine cash originates from creators. Four or five up and coming fashion designers hire a stall at each event which gives the direct access to the customers. Rentez-Vous takes a 30% expense and, if tenants choose they need to get it a short time later, a 20% charge again from the sale.
In this way, the peer to peer fashion industry works and people get benefit from it easily. Collaboration does not stop there, small fashion brands join Crowdholding and receive feedback and ideas for new collections directly from potential customers.
Please do not hesitate in contacting us if you have any questions or concern regarding this topic. Here at Crowdholding we will be very please to bring you any helpful additional information on this matter.

Wednesday, February 22, 2017

Fashion Industry altered by non-equity crowdfunding

Fashion Industry altered by non-equity crowdfunding


Non-equity Crowdfunding has been one of the best ideas for every growing business nowadays. A lot of companies have received real benefits thanks to this practice. There are two types of non-equity crowdfunding: reward-based (e.g. Kickstarter) and revenue-sharing (Crowdholding). Small businesses can raise capital by offering a % of future revenue for a certain period of time, something like a dividend. In this article, we will explain a little how non-equity crowdfunding has helped in the growing of fashion industry, and also share some thoughts regarding if this activity will keep bringing benefits over the next years. Let's start and read carefully then:
IS CROWDFUNDING GOOD FOR THE FASHION INDUSTRY?
As you may be thinking, fashion sales have increased by 640 percent to more than 34,000 units in the last years. But to help fuel in the industry growth, Lynn and Epstein, which are in fact two famous persons on the business in the United States, needed to raise more capital. (As a direct-to-consumer label, customer acquisition is a critical — and expensive — main point of the whole business.)
However, instead of turning once again to venture some capital firms or credits from banks, the co-founders decided to launch a campaign on equity crowdfunding platform SeedInvest, a famous crowdfunding foundation which allows companies to raise some lots of money from Internet users from all around the world.
ARE YOU INTO THE FASHION BUSINESS? HOW ABOUT TO TRY CROWDHOLDING?
Over the last decades, US regulations forbid non-accredited investors — which are those with a net worth of a quantity which represents less than $1 million and who earned less than $200,000 every year for the last two years — from making equity investments in early stage companies and businesses, which are inherently risky, on the grounds of investor protection and so.
(On popular crowdfunding sites like Kickstarter and other ones, people who contribute funds are usually rewarded with giveaways like POP material, t-shirts, but do not acquire equity in the companies they support.) But in June 2015, in response to some hard criticism that ordinary investors were being locked out of the start-up boom of growth strategies, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) implemented Title IV of the JOBS Act, which, among other things, now allows non-accredited individuals and other companies to invest in early stage businesses.
Lynn and Epstein have posted their pitch on SeedInvest in September 2015 and, so far, DSTLD has obtain a benefit of more than $9.4 million worth of “indicated interest” from individual investors and some companies. Whether or not that interest turns into actual cash remains to be seen yet: not only do these would-be investors still need to make real commitments and some other work, but DSTLD still needs to determine just how much equity investors will receive from this practice. Contrary to equity crowdfunding, crowdholding gives small business access to capital without loss of control, allowing them to share future revenue instead. Crowdholding allows your best customers to participate in the brand story in a really profound way. They can be evangelizers of the product.
There is no doubt that crowdfunding is in fact a powerful concept to make grow your business
But one that has rarely worked in practice for fashion labels aiming to crowdfund their growth and so. Indeed, while most of the companies are projected to raise $34.4 billion in crowdfunded investments in 2015 and 2016 respectively, according to research and advisory firm Massolution, just a sliver of those companies which are using crowdfunding operate in the well-known apparel sector.
Of the 93,546 projects successfully funded on Kickstarter since the platform launched amongst some others, only 3,163 (or 3 percent) have been fashion-related or have any relationship with the fashion business world. And while the success rate of technology-related campaigns (20 percent) is actually lower than that of fashion-related campaigns, believe it or not (24 percent), technology projects have successfully raised a total of $297 million, which is significantly more than the $59 million raised by fashion projects from all around the country .
But for many proponents of the idea and approach, Title IV of the JOBS Act — and, more recently, Title III of the same regulation area, passed by the SEC on October 30, which makes it even easier for early stage startups and some little companies to raise money from non-accredited investors — have changed the prospects for non-equity crowdfunding in fashion business world.
To be sure of all of this matter, not everyone is pleased with the new rules of growth strategies in the United States. Companies wishing to raise under $20 million dollars will have to submit to review or be reviewed by US state governments and Crowdholding is concerned that these authorities will charge a big amount of exorbitant fees and bottleneck the whole process.
New rules of crowdfunding, which are set to go into effect on January 29, 2016, have undoubtedly created an incredible new momentum for both crowdfunding platforms and individual companies and businesses aiming to crowdfund their expansion and keep growing.
Should crowdfunding be a little bit less regulated?
There is no doubt for us that crowdfunding is one of the best ideas to expand a business nowadays. The thing is that this is turning into something bigger than expected on the first place, and now there are a lot of laws and regulations for the whole practice. Maybe the thing is to regulate this operation so a lot of companies could join on it (or decide not to do it) without being in the middle of an unfair game.
We think crowdfunding must be free from a lot of those regulations. In fact, crowdfunding aims to ask for help of a lot of possible new customers from all around the world, by asking for help with an outstanding advertising campaign. Of course, there is a lot of people out there who does not want to be into the fair game, and maybe that is the cause and reason for a lot of new regulations for crowdfunding nowadays.
Please do not hesitate in contacting us if you have any questions or concern regarding this topic. We will be very pleased to bring you any helpful additional information on this matter. Learn about crowdholding in 1 minute, watch our video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lXQm0xMSHq4